Personal injury case? Those affected have a choice. There are plenty of personal injury attorneys out there. We get it.
So, why us? Because our fee philosophy, tenacity, personal attention, and experience make a difference.
FEE PHILOSOPHY:
“No Fee Guarantee,” “No Fee Unless We Win,” “Our No Fee Promise,” and the like – such advertisements are commonplace. Given the philanthropic, oft-paternalistic tone of these ads, it may come as a small surprise to learn these fee practices are nothing new; personal injury attorneys have been handling cases on this basis for generations, known in the legal world as a contingent fee arrangement. With such an arrangement in place, clients owe no legal fee if, for whatever reason, there is no money recovery in their case. If there is a money recovery then the fee is calculated as a percentage of that recovery, usually one-third. So, assuming $30,000 in unpaid medical bills and a case resolution of $75,000.00, following a one-third legal fee of $25,000 and payment of said medical bills, the client would only receive $20,000 — less than the attorney! Such an outcome simply won’t happen with us.
When our firm works on a contingent basis, our fee philosophy is that unless your recovery is reduced by a something unrelated to your case, such as a child support obligation or social services lien, our fee will not exceed our clients' portion of the recovery. Plain and simple – we will reduce our fee so our clients receive at least an equal amount.
Unlike most firms, we do not track the time we spend on personal injury cases to gauge whether a specific case was “profitable” for us. Our goal is simply to get the most compensation for our clients, regardless of how many hours it may take.
TENACITY:
The mark of a good lawyer is not how much the lawyer recovers for a client (the fact is, in most instances a large recovery is more indicative of an extreme injury than the lawyer’s influence), it is how much more the lawyer recovers for a client than what the responsible party or their insurance company might have been willing to pay without the lawyer’s involvement.
When the other side says no, we work harder.
Take the following example of one former case:
client represented by one of our most accomplished personal injury attorneys, Christopher M. Licari, was injured when a car pulled out from a commercial parking lot in front of the motorcycle on which she was a passenger, causing collision. Attorney Licari believed the owner of the lot allowed cars to be parked too close to the road so as to obstruct the exiting car’s view of oncoming traffic. The owner’s insurance company disagreed and stated it would not be making any payment. Licari sued and fought for almost five years, and after taking multiple depositions and our accident reconstructionist recreating the scene by computer, on the eve of trial the insurance company paid close to half a million dollars.
ur firm works just as hard on smaller-profile cases. One major insurance company once informed Attorney Licari they thought another client, whom they insured under an underinsured motorist policy, was responsible for the collision and would not be making any settlement offer. Licari only pressed harder, obtained evidence that the other driver was intoxicated, received $100,000 in compensation from said driver, and forced the insurer to pay a settlement of $22,000 to top it all. This result was particularly satisfying for Attorney Licari because another law firm had turned down the case — thinking it could not be won. Our attorneys' tenacity makes all the difference for our clients.
PERSONAL ATTENTION:
Our attorneys explain each step of the process to our clients and are accessible after hours and on weekends. We take pride in not passing off our cases to inexperienced associates, and enjoy getting to know each of our clients and learning what makes them, and their case, unique. We treat each case knowing it is the only opportunity our client has to recover compensation for an injury, and due to this philosophy, our clients never feel as though they are just a file number, let alone feel pressured to settle because their legal representative needs to meet a monthly settlement quota. Our firm will always feel like a second home to our clients.
EXPERIENCE: Attorneys Fasano and Licari have been advocating for clients injured by the fault of another for decades, having tried many cases to jury verdict in both state and federal court, recovering combined millions of dollars in money damages. Attorney Fasano has also accepted recognition from all corners of Connecticut for his work in the State Legislature holding drunk drivers, predatory practitioners in the healthcare field, and other bad-faith actors accountable. On the other hand, Attorney Licari has served as a court arbitrator, upon appointment by the Chief Court Administrator, for the State of Connecticut over the past ten years. In this capacity, Attorney Licari presides over dozens of hearings in personal injury cases, which has enabled him to hone his own advocacy skills. He has also been selected to serve as a private arbitrator, entrusted by all parties involved, and has built a reputation among insurance adjusters and defense attorneys throughout Connecticut as a straightforward, hardworking, unyielding advocate for clients. For a small Connecticut law firm, the combined experience of our attorneys is unparalleled.
In most personal injury cases, the aggrieved party should consult with an experienced attorney. In some instances, however, hiring a personal injury attorney is an invaluable asset to a case. Our attorneys have dealt with many different types of personal injury situations, but here are a few in which we highly recommend seeking the aid of an attorney:
Long-Term or Permanent Disability Injuries
Some accidents cause significant injuries that can have a long-lasting effect on the victim's capabilities or appearance, spanning over a year or even permanently. Calculating the compensation for an injury of this nature requires the knowledge and guidance of an experienced attorney. There are significant consequences to consider, such as careers, pain and suffering, as well as emotional fallout, e.g. loss of consortium or depression.
Severe Injuries
The severity of a victim's injury is usually determined according to the amount of medical bills, types of injuries incurred, and the length of time required to recover. As potential compensation increases, so does the range of compensation. An attorney's services are arguably necessary because of the complex legal element of such cases, or simply because an insurance company refuses to settle fairly.
Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice is defined as injury or illness caused by the negligence (carelessness) or incompetent treatment from a doctor, nurse, hospital, laboratory, clinic, or other healthcare provider. If one suffers from an experience of medical malpractice, the medical and legal questions involved are complex and specialized. Such instances almost certainly necessitate a lawyer with experience in medical malpractice cases to make sure that the victim receives the compensation and future treatment that they deserve.
Exposure to Toxic Chemicals
Injury claims of exposure can be difficult to prove and often involve complex scientific data. In addition, chemical and products industries have an army of legal staff to protect themselves from legal consequences. An expert lawyer on the side of the parties standing up to these actors will help to obtain fair compensation.
When an Insurance Company Won’t Settle
Sometimes, regardless of the injury or the resulting financial issues, an insurance company, or the government agency responsible, refuses any fair settlement offers. In cases like this, it is best to hire an experienced attorney to fight with the law on their side.
If one is involved in an auto accident while using a cell phone, regardless of whether or not, as a driver, one is found legally responsible, it could have a significant affect on any compensation.
Know the risks when you pick up that phone in the car. Examples of reckless driving caused by a cell phone:
In most personal injury lawsuits, the defendant is blamed for an accident. If the defendant was using a cell phone before or during an accident, it will certainly affect the outcome of the case. In other recent cases, injured plaintiffs have also contributed to the accident because they were using a cell phone. The plaintiff’s comparative or contributory negligence will definitely affect compensation.
Employees on Cell Phones
Recent accident cases have argued that employers may be held legally responsible for their employee’s accident if the employee was on a work-related call at the time of the accident. The injured plaintiff is more likely to sue the employer than the employee, typically because the employer has more money. Because of this, a growing number of employers have prohibited employees from making or taking work-related calls while on the road.
Children on Cell Phones
Cell phones and electronics distract teenage drivers constantly, but while driving, this nascent phenomenon is especially dangerous. In some cases, where a minor has caused an accident because of cell phone use, courts have ruled that the parent of the minor child is held responsible for damages. The laws are still much more fluid in this area, but parents should consider the magnitude of such consequences when handing their children car keys and a cell phone.
Insurance
Insurance companies have noticed the increase in cell phone-related accidents and this trend will most likely have an affect on premiums and policy across the board. So put down the cell phone and drive.
One aspect is similar in all personal injury cases: the necessity of expert witnesses. Personal injury cases involve damages, liability, and proof. Part of the procedure for determining proof or evidence of liability is the disclosure of an expert witness to provide the case with an objective standard of assessing damages and liability. It is critical that all of the expert witnesses agree on the elements of all three key areas – damages, liability, and proof – in order for the plaintiff to be awarded compensation for his or her injuries.
Our firm will always assemble a prolific team of expert witnesses to give professional opinions on any instances of negligence in question. To be clear, in all personal injury suits, including medical malpractice suits, auto accidents, or nursing home issues; negligence is defined as conduct that falls below the standards of behavior established by law to protect against unreasonable risk of harm.
In a traumatic brain injury case, for example, negligence could be on the part of a medical health provider, a pharmaceutical company, or by an individual who caused an accident. The victim could experience a decrease in cognitive brain function, the inability to work, or other psychological or physiological detriment. The expert witnesses called could include another healthcare professional, a neurologist, psychologist, etc. who will assess the victim’s medical condition, the range of their impairment, and the alteration to daily lifestyles since the injury. The expert witness’s assessments are specifically important because they outline the necessity and cost of future treatment and/or training and how it relates to the severity of the injury.
Personal injuries are traumatic and trying to pursue compensation greatly compounds stress. Our attorneys are dedicated to relieving as much stress as possible by putting our knowledge and experience on the side of our clients to secure the compensation they deserve.
Here is a simple guide that can serve as a helpful tool to determine the legal responsibility in case of accident or personal injury:
*Everyone is entitled to a free consultation with our firm.
107 Montowese Street, Branford, Connecticut 06405, United States
Everyone is entitled to a free consultation with our firm.
107 Montowese Street, Branford, Connecticut 06405, United States
Copyright © 2024 Fasano, Ippolito, Lee & Florentine, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.
Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and their respective employers.
Oral or written correspondence with any of our attorneys does not constitute an official attorney-client relationship; a signed retainer agreement is required for such.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.